Moral hazard is when they take your money and then are not responsible for what they do with it. ~ Gordon Gekko
1. Relevance of Moral Hazard
THE unemployment rate in the United States is now around 9%. Over 13% of all US mortgages are either delinquent or in foreclosure (Mortgage Bankers Association). Total loses resulting from the sub-prime mortgage crisis are expected to run into the trillions of dollars.
At the heart of this global financial meltdown is a concept known as “moral hazard”.
2. What is Moral Hazard?
Moral Hazard is a concept that is often misunderstood, or at least badly explained, by people who should know what they are talking about; business writers, politicians, most online business dictionaries and sometimes even economists … And so we turn to Hollywood for clarity.
Gordon Gekko captured the nature of Moral Hazard very concisely when he explained that “moral hazard is when they take your money and then are not responsible for what they do with it.”
Gekko may well have borrowed his definition from Paul Krugman; Professor of Economics at Princeton University, 2008 Nobel Prize winner, and New York Times columnist. Krugman describes Moral Hazard as “…any situation in which one person makes the decision about how much risk to take, while someone else bears the cost if things go badly.”
To summarise these two iconic figures, we might simply think of Moral Hazard as any situation where a person or organisation is not fully responsible for the consequences of its actions. As a result, the person or organisation may take greater risks than it otherwise would because it is not responsible for paying the full cost if things go badly.
It is worth noting that “Moral Hazard” is an economic concept and does not necessarily imply that there is any immorality or unscrupulous dealing involved, not necessarily.